RAID 5 Capacity Calculator
Estimate usable storage, parity overhead, and efficiency for a RAID 5 array.
Note: This calculator assumes equal drive sizes and standard single-parity RAID 5 behavior.
How This RAID 5 Calculator Works
RAID 5 uses block-level striping with distributed parity. In plain English: your data is spread across all drives, and parity information is also distributed so the array can survive one drive failure. The calculator above helps you estimate three things quickly: how much space you really get, how much capacity parity consumes, and how efficient your layout is.
Many users look only at raw disk totals and get surprised later. For example, six 8 TB drives do not give 48 TB of usable RAID 5 storage. One drive-equivalent is used by parity, and additional space can be consumed by formatting and filesystem metadata. That’s why it’s useful to calculate before buying hardware.
RAID 5 Formula (Core Capacity Math)
Primary capacity formula
For standard RAID 5 with N active drives of equal size:
- Usable capacity (before formatting overhead) = (N − 1) × drive size
- Parity overhead = 1 × drive size
- Fault tolerance = 1 failed drive
If you assign one or more drives as hot spares, those spare disks are not included in active capacity. In the calculator, active drives are computed as: active drives = total drives − hot spares.
Example: Practical RAID 5 Planning
Suppose you have 8 drives, each 12 TB, and you reserve 1 as a hot spare:
- Active drives: 7
- Raw active capacity: 84 TB
- RAID 5 usable before formatting: (7 − 1) × 12 = 72 TB
- If you assume 5% formatting overhead: 68.4 TB estimated usable
That gives you a realistic estimate for planning backup windows, growth projections, and budget.
When RAID 5 Is a Good Fit
Best use cases
- Read-heavy workloads with moderate write activity
- File servers, archival media, and general NAS deployments
- Teams that need a balance between capacity and redundancy
Tradeoffs to understand
- Write penalty compared with RAID 10 due to parity calculations
- Long rebuild times on very large disks
- Only one-drive fault tolerance; a second failure during rebuild is dangerous
RAID 5 vs RAID 6 vs RAID 10
| RAID Level | Min Drives | Usable Capacity Rule | Fault Tolerance | Typical Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAID 5 | 3 | (N−1) × drive size | 1 drive | Capacity efficiency |
| RAID 6 | 4 | (N−2) × drive size | 2 drives | Higher resilience |
| RAID 10 | 4 | (N/2) × drive size | Varies by mirror pairs | Best write performance |
If your rebuild windows are long or your drives are very large (for example 16 TB+), RAID 6 is often a safer default. If your workload is write-intensive and latency-sensitive, RAID 10 is frequently better.
Best Practices Before You Build
- Use matched drives: identical size and similar performance reduce bottlenecks.
- Keep backups: RAID is not backup. It improves availability, not accidental-deletion recovery.
- Monitor SMART and alerts: early warning helps replace weak drives before failure.
- Plan spare strategy: hot spares can shorten recovery time and reduce operational risk.
- Test restores: backup reliability matters more than backup existence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can RAID 5 survive two drive failures?
No. Standard RAID 5 is designed to survive exactly one drive failure. A second failed drive in the same array before rebuild completion usually causes data loss.
Can I mix drive sizes in RAID 5?
You can in some systems, but effective capacity is usually limited by the smallest drive. For predictable results, use identical disk sizes.
Why does my OS show less capacity than the calculator?
Vendors typically advertise decimal units, while operating systems may report binary units, and filesystems reserve metadata space. The overhead field in this calculator is there to model that real-world gap.
Final Thought
A RAID 5 calculator is most useful before you buy hardware and before you commit to an array design. Use it to compare configurations, then choose the layout that matches your uptime goals, performance profile, and risk tolerance. Capacity is only one dimension; resilience and recovery strategy are just as important.