Value at Risk Calculator
Estimate potential portfolio loss using the parametric (variance-covariance) VaR approach.
What Is Value at Risk (VaR)?
Value at Risk (VaR) is a risk metric used to estimate how much money a portfolio could lose over a specified time period at a given confidence level. In plain language, VaR answers this question: “How bad could losses get in normal market conditions?”
Example: a 1-day 95% VaR of $8,000 means that on most days (95 out of 100), losses should be less than $8,000. It also implies that roughly 5 out of 100 days may have losses larger than $8,000.
Formula Used in This Calculator
This page uses the parametric VaR method (also called variance-covariance VaR), assuming returns are normally distributed.
- VaR (%) = z × σ × √t − μ × t
- VaR ($) = Portfolio Value × VaR (%)
Where:
- z = z-score for the selected confidence level (e.g., 1.645 for 95%)
- σ = daily volatility (decimal form)
- μ = expected daily return (decimal form)
- t = time horizon in days
How to Interpret Your Results
1) VaR Amount
This is the estimated loss threshold in dollars for your chosen confidence and horizon.
2) VaR Percentage
This normalizes risk as a percentage of your current portfolio value, making comparisons easier across portfolios.
3) Expected Shortfall (CVaR)
The calculator also displays Expected Shortfall, which estimates the average loss on days when losses exceed VaR. Many risk managers prefer this metric because it captures tail severity better than VaR alone.
Why VaR Is Popular in Finance
- Simple, intuitive risk summary in one number
- Useful for setting trading limits and risk budgets
- Common in institutional risk reporting and regulation
- Helps compare risk across asset classes and strategies
Important Limitations
VaR is useful, but it is not a complete risk system by itself. Keep these limitations in mind:
- Normal-distribution assumptions may underestimate extreme events
- Historical relationships can break during market stress
- VaR does not directly tell you the worst possible loss
- Different VaR methods can produce different results
Three Common VaR Methods
Parametric VaR
Fast and convenient; best when return distributions are close to normal and correlations are stable.
Historical Simulation VaR
Uses real historical return data with fewer distribution assumptions; quality depends heavily on historical window choice.
Monte Carlo VaR
Simulates many possible future paths and can model complex portfolios; flexible but computationally heavier.
Best Practices for Better Risk Management
- Use VaR together with stress testing and scenario analysis
- Monitor Expected Shortfall for tail-risk awareness
- Backtest model predictions against actual outcomes
- Recalibrate volatility and correlation assumptions regularly
- Set position limits and stop-loss policies based on risk tolerance
Quick Example
Suppose you have a $1,000,000 portfolio, 1.5% daily volatility, 0.02% expected daily return, 95% confidence, and a 1-day horizon. VaR can indicate a one-day loss threshold around the low tens of thousands of dollars. If your risk budget is lower than this figure, you may need to reduce leverage, hedge exposures, or diversify.
Final Thought
A value at risk calculation is a practical starting point, not an endpoint. Treat VaR as a dashboard gauge: useful for direction and speed, but always pair it with broader diagnostics before making high-stakes decisions.